Cita:[...] Nicolas Guérin, World Level Design Director on Unity, told TechRadar that the decision was partly to give the game more of a cinematic gloss - though did admit that it was also tough to achieve.

"At Ubisoft for a long time we wanted to push 60 fps. I don't think it was a good idea because you don't gain that much from 60 fps and it doesn't look like the real thing. It's a bit like The Hobbit movie, it looked really weird.

"And in other games it's the same - like the Rachet and Clank series [where it was dropped]. So I think collectively in the video game industry we're dropping that standard because it's hard to achieve, it's twice as hard as 30fps, and its not really that great in terms of rendering quality of the picture and the image."

Cita:Alex Amancio, the game's Creative Director, reiterated this point: "30 was our goal, it feels more cinematic. 60 is really good for a shooter, action adventure not so much. It actually feels better for people when it's at that 30fps. It also lets us push the limits of everything to the maximum.
"It's like when people start asking about resolution. Is it the number of the quality of the pixels that you want? If the game looks gorgeous, who cares about the number?"

Fuente: http://www.techradar.com/news/gaming/viv...rd-1268241

30 patadas en la boca les daba yo...

Necesito un facepalm acorde a éstas declaraciones, voy a buscarlo...

(09-10-2014 09:26)Santi RC link escribió:Necesito un facepalm acorde a éstas declaraciones, voy a buscarlo...

te vale?

No está mal pero creo que no es suficiente por lo vergonzoso del tema.

Yo tiraria más del clásico y efectivo....

No hay ninguno mas masivo;

Justo antes de ver este hilo curiosamente estaba leyendo un artículo de extremetech que habla de los 48 fps de El Hobbit, que no han gustado a todos. Tiene cierta relación. Irónicamente dicen lo contrario de esta gente y aquí los espectadores se quejan de que es demasiado real a tantos fps.

In technology, where more is almost always better, it is unusual to hear complaints about something getting faster. Some viewers of An Unexpected Journey complained that the scenes were ÔÇ£too realÔÇØ ÔÇö the 48 fps recording rendering the action so lifelike that they had trouble remembering that Middle Earth was supposed to be a fantasy. Other viewers missed the languid feel of traditional 24 fps movies. Unconsciously, weÔÇÖre also used to 30 fps and above content being ÔÇ£made for TV,ÔÇØ and are accustomed to feature films showing at the lower 24 fps rate.

Es cosa de percepción y acostumbrarse, está claro. Fijo que si me acostumbrase a los 48fps en cine o 60/100 fps en pc, luego estaría echando pestes de lo que andase por debajo. Dentro de lo malo, suerte que soy un rácano con lo que no he llegado a notar mejorias extremas.

A mí AC me la trae al fresco hablando pronto y mal, pero fastidia que gente del medio suelte estas estupideces porque se creen eso, que las escuchan y se las creen una panda de estúpidos a los que se dirigen y entre quienes nos encontramos nosotros mismos, los que pululamos por los foros y leemos este tipo de noticias o comentarios.

Para mí Assassin's Creed es una saga tan plana, tan automatizada, tan casualizada, que no vale la pena jugar, sólo ser vista por Youtube. Y ahí es donde cobran sentido estas declaraciones.

Vamos a ver, no les importa decir que caparán una versión para asemejarse a la otra, y luego no son capaces de admitir que los 60fps son demasiados??┬á no los entiendo.

No se vosotros, pero a mi me daria verguenza trabajar en Ubisoft y tener que decir esta sarta de estupideces.